Barrister fined for drinking alcohol in court car park during break

Avatar photo

By Lydia Fontes on

19

£3k

Snaresbrook Crown Court – credit: Cassianto/Wikicommons

A barrister has been fined £3,000 by the Bar Tribunals & Adjudication Service after he was reported to be drinking alcohol in his car during a break in a criminal trial.

Dominic Charles D’Souza was representing a client at Snaresbrook Crown Court in North East London when, during a break in proceedings, he consumed alcohol in his car which was parked in the court’s carpark. The tribunal does not disclosed what exactly he drank.

The 2025 Legal Cheek Chambers Most List

D’Souza withdrew from the case as result of other allegations which were not pursued by the regulator and which the tribunal accepted were false. The jury was discharged and a new trial date was fixed.

D’Souza, a tenant of London’s Goldsmith Chambers, admitted all three charges against him, conceding that he had behaved in a way likely to diminish public trust in his profession, as well as wasting the time of the court and foreseeably interfering with the administration of justice.

The barrister was fined £3,000, £1,000 on each charge, and ordered to pay £2,670 in costs, although the findings and sanction remain open to appeal.

UPDATE: 11 July, 16:23pm: An earlier version of this article stated that Mr D’Souza’s drinking led to his withdrawal from a trial. In fact, his withdrawal followed more serious allegations made against him, which were later found to be false. We are happy to clarify this.

19 Comments

Peter

Oh for the days when justice ruled and this was mandatory….

Wiz Key

Hard to take a view on this without knowing exactly what alcohol was consumed…

Barrister of Counsel

Blimey!

Was it because he was in his car or has the customary lunchtime glass of wine now suddenly become a problem?

Anonymous

Whilst this might be a grey area, one could only assume that in live case, with break in proceedings, could be constitute as drinking at work, which to all extent is a rule that guided other employment rules.

Again, it’s a grey area, without the full facts.

Archibald O'Pomposity

He’s not an employee you moron.

Jonathan

I dont get it.
If he had been seen drinking at the Dog and Partridge down the road. Would that be an offence?
And sherry or wine is commonly served at lunch in the judges dining room in many crown courts.
Unless his performance in court was adversely affected what is his real offence?

Archibald O'Pomposity

Context is King. The article makes this perfectly clear without even needing to find the judgment. He was drinking alcohol visibly and obviously in his car in the car park during a break in the middle of a criminal proceeding. If he were representing you would you be so blase?

David Stewart

There’s definitely more to this than we’re being told.

Anonymous

Must have been a question of how much and whether he admitted it affected his capability to properly represent his client. After all its not unknown for both Judges and lawyers to go to the pub for lunch and they are not all having a club soda.

The full judgement is available somewhere. He was drinking brandy.

T11

Top lad.

Al K Hall

That’s the beauty of vodka. It looks like water.

Hamidu Borsu Chodi Esq

Where else can we read that he drank brandy

Archibald O'Pomposity

How many places do you want to read it? Isn’t one sufficient?

You daft sod.

Sam

Fascinating to see the likes and dislikes on the comments showing that many supposed professionals think boozing at lunchtime is fine. Would you be fine with your builder having a bit of booze in his van at lunch before he dose some structural work on your house? How about your surgeon before a bit of heart surgery?

There is no place for booze at work. FULL STOP

Alcohol makes your decision making worse. It makes you worse at your job. Get a grip you bafoons.

Archibald O'Pomposity

Ah, enter the semi-literati.

Drunken sailor

Well he is a member of the bar!

M zambonini

What about our mps? Cheap food and booze then a sleep on the benches? These are the people who are supposedly running the country?

Archibald O'Pomposity

Well you voted them in. Go and complain to Lindsey Hoyle.

Join the conversation

Related Stories

Barrister fined for calling opposition lawyer a ‘hysterical woman’

Feliks Jerzy Kwiatkowski told disciplinary tribunal that women being more emotional is 'biological fact'

Feb 9 2022 1:57pm
27